Mark's False Claim:

The Truth:

At Mark's roulette computer review site (roulettecomputerreviews.com), he labels my system and computers as "fraudulent".

With regards to the system, he claims it is known to fail, and other inspecific information.

With regards to my computer, he refers to Bago, and claims he is a "victim" of my "scam".

Mark denies owning roulettecomputerreviews.com although almost everyone already knows he owns it - it is incredibly obvious. After all he gives top reviews for his own computer when most people know what rubbish it is. The only other top reviews are for computers that either don't exist, or that aren't sold to the public. Why? To add credibility the review of his own computer. He claims to be "Professor Johansen", who is a fake identity he created to escape negative feedback and sell his devices. But irrespective of who owns the site, you only need to consider the following:

UPDATE 13th MARCH 2009: Mark now admits to owning roulettecomputerreviews.com. We also had it confirmed by his web host.

On the same page that he gives my products a FRAUDULENT rating, Mark gives a high rating to bias analysis and visual ballistics, and recognizes them as legitimate and effective techniques. However, he fails to mention that these techniques are part of my system. Download a free evaluation of the primordials document, which outlines the techniques I teach - you can see visual ballistics and bias analysis are part of what I teach. In reality, these techniques alone are less than 10% of the overall information you learn when becoming my player. When you become my player, you receive the best of the known effective techniques, plus a lot more. It truly is the most complete and comprehensive course to beating roulette available anywhere.

So while Mark is calling me a scammer, on the same page he is giving good reviews to techniques I teach. ISN'T THIS A LITTLE CONTRADICTORY? Yes of course it is, but Mark is simply not interested in the truth - he only wants to harm me.

As for the claims about my computer, Mark has never even seen it. All he knows about it is nonsense he heard from Bago, and Bago didn't have any idea what he was talking about. Mark makes other rubbish claims but they are addressed in Mark's Episode II.

Mark claims that my system is based on "dealer signature". Specifically he states that in all of my demonstration videos (including for my roulette computers), I release the ball from specific points to make the ball spin in a predictable manner.

At one of his web sites, he published screenshots of a few spins at the point where the ball is released. Not all of the screenshots suited his claim, and next to such screesnhots he accused me of merely making a mistake.

Firstly, have a good long read of my page about Dealer Signature. This reveals Howe's manipulation in detail, and provides statistical data you can verify yourself.

Now see two other videos where I'm not even spinning the wheel:

Live online casino # 1 (76MB)

Live online casino # 2 (98MB)

Mark of course can't claim I spin these wheels, so he ignores them. You can also see my roulette computer videos to confirm there's no truth to his claims - he doesn't expect you to actually check.

Regarding my roulette system, he refers to the video at 1hrdemo.wmv because it's the only roulette system demo video where I spin the wheel. You can see at the very beginning of the video, a basic outline of what my system consists of is specified. Clearly you can see that "dealer signature" is listed as one of the methods I teach. Mark is fully aware of this, he just doesn't care about truth.

In the video, does the ball release point have any bearing on the predictions? In part they do. However, you will see that a lot of the time the prediction is not at the expected reference point. Why? That is another matter, and I can explain it to you if you become a player. Mark claims it is just because I make mistakes.

All videos on my site are intentionally simplistic versions of a custom variant. I have not and never will publish any video that may assist casinos to understand anything relevant about more sensitive elements of my system. By demonstrating basic ball ballistic principles that are nowhere near as sensitive as my more sophisticated methods, I achieve my goal of teaching people that roulette spins are not random, without releasing overly sensitive information. Even on the newest wheel designs, the spins are never random, and most certainly you can take advantage of this.

My "custom variant" systems use 9 different pattern types. Does my system rely on dealer signature? NO - it does not rely on any single pattern type. My custom variants use a combination of different legitimate pattern types to achieve a combined overall edge - no single pattern type is relied on. So say for example one pattern type gave a 1% edge, and another pattern type gave a 3% edge. When you COMBINE the two pattern types, you get an overall edge of 4%. That's exactly what a custom variant is - the combination of different legitimate principles and patterns. Is there anything mystical about the patterns? NO, it is basic physics - it is only mystical to someone that doesn't know the first thing about it, like Mark Howe.

Does my system need consistency of ball release points or dealer signature to be accurate? NO. But if ball release points are more consistent, then the wheel will naturally be easier to beat. Similarly, does a wheel need to be biased for my system to be effective? NO. But if a bias is found, then of course the bias will be incorporated into the custom variant to maximize the player's edge. The majority of pattern types have absolutely nothing to do with ball release points or exploiting flaws of wheels - they have to do with the fixed physical properties of wheels, and the resulting long-term patterns. These patterns will occur on any wheel, old or new. And they will occur even if the wheel and rotor speeds are varied enormously, or if the ball is changed very frequently.

Essentially all Mark is doing is twisting this information to suit himself. The more you read about Mark's claims, the better you understand how he simply doesn't care about the truth because it doesn't suit him. If you read the Dealer Signature page, you'll see Mark's nonsense claims obliterated.

-------

Now for something you may find extra interesting: At the following website, Mark published an article about himself. He even publishes a photo of my roulette computer on my roulette wheel. Mark posts an additional message on this page, and says:

"come and try the products yourself just like the guardian Reporters did, set up on a level wheel, i can beat level and titled wheels with my mobile phones. Check out the video evidence at http://roulettecomputers.com"

Unbelievably he is trying to claim my websites and videos are actually his. Additionally, in the same post, he lies claiming I cheat in all my videos by using dealer signature. In other words, he is stealing credit for my video, claiming he owns my site roulettecomputers.com, all while claiming I'm a fraud and I cheat in my videos. See it all for yourself at:

http://www.gearlive.com/news/article/roulette-computer-inventor-claims-advantage-over-casino-918809/

NOTE: Mark now removed the page in panic. However, for now at least it is still available in Google's cache - click here.

I might add Mark claims the demo to the Guardian newspaper was on a level wheel. This is a lie. If you read Guardian's article, it is made quite clear the demo was on a tilted wheel. Specifically the whole article is about exploiting flawed wheels, and it states "Mark Howe, who sells the devices for £1,000 from a workshop in Sheffield, claims his software will also work on level wheels". The more you learn about Mark, the more you learn he may literally be a pathological liar.